Skip to content

Distinguished Government Employee Award

Back to dashboard
MA

Mariam Al Suwaidi

Head of Digital Services

Ajman Digital Government

0out of 100

Overall pre-score

Good

Eligibility screening

Seven hard rules — all must pass.

Eligible

7 of 7 checks passed

  • R1The nominee should hold a full-time employment contract; part-time or temporary contract holders are not eligible.

    Holds a full-time contract.

    Meets requirement
  • R2The nominee should not be seconded or assigned at the time of participation, and participation must fall within the scope of the employee's original position, whose duties they actually and continuously perform.

    Not seconded or assigned; performs the original position.

    Meets requirement
  • R3The nominee's official job title should correspond to the duties and responsibilities actually performed.

    Official job title corresponds to actual duties.

    Meets requirement
  • R4The nominee should have secured a rating of not less than 'very good' in the annual performance evaluation during the last two years of employment.

    Last two annual ratings: excellent, excellent.

    Meets requirement
  • R5The nominee should have completed not less than two years of service with the authority.

    11 year(s) of service with the authority.

    Meets requirement
  • R6The nominee's employment file should be free from any disciplinary or penal sanctions during the past two years.

    No disciplinary or penal sanctions in the past two years.

    Meets requirement
  • R7The same employee may not be nominated for two consecutive cycles.

    Not nominated in the previous cycle.

    Meets requirement

Category

AI best-fit

Supervisory Employee

Matches nomination
Confidence90%

Rationale

Supervises 18 employees (≥ 2).

Attachments

  • Digital Platform Impact Report.pdf

    48,210 characters parsed

  • Team 360 Feedback.docx

    15,320 characters parsed

  • Service KPIs.csv

    8,100 characters parsed

Criterion detail

Criteria are weighted equally by default.

5 sub-criteria

  • 1.1

    Personal effort and exceptional achievements

    Excellent77

    Justification

    Evidence maps to the “Excellent” band. The employee exerted exceptional efforts far beyond the scope of the assigned duties, achieving qualitative and inspiring accomplishments that had a tangible im…

    Official rubric · Excellent

    The employee exerted exceptional efforts far beyond the scope of the assigned duties, achieving qualitative and inspiring accomplishments that had a tangible impact on the authority or at a governmental or national level, with a clear commitment to excellence and innovation.

    Evidence

    Led the national unification of 42 government services onto a single platform, reducing average processing time by 93% from 6 days to under 4 hours and improving customer satisfaction from 78% to 96%.

    Narrative

    Mentored and trained a team of 18, established a data-driven service-design guild adopted authority-wide, and set the unit's strategic roadmap.

    Narrative

  • 1.2

    Contribution to the strategic plan and alignment of achievements with individual and organizational objectives

    Excellent78

    Justification

    Evidence maps to the “Excellent” band. The employee effectively contributed to achieving the authority's strategic objectives through accomplishments directly and clearly linked to the individual and…

    Official rubric · Excellent

    The employee effectively contributed to achieving the authority's strategic objectives through accomplishments directly and clearly linked to the individual and organizational goals, delivering impactful results that significantly support corporate performance indicators.

    Evidence

    Led the national unification of 42 government services onto a single platform, reducing average processing time by 93% from 6 days to under 4 hours and improving customer satisfaction from 78% to 96%.

    Narrative

    Mentored and trained a team of 18, established a data-driven service-design guild adopted authority-wide, and set the unit's strategic roadmap.

    Narrative

  • 1.3

    Speed and accuracy of performance and utilization of time and resources

    Good73

    Justification

    Evidence maps to the “Good” band. The employee's achievements were characterized by speed and accuracy in carrying out tasks and achieving goals, and optimal use of available time and resources,…

    Official rubric · Good

    The employee's achievements were characterized by speed and accuracy in carrying out tasks and achieving goals, and optimal use of available time and resources, including technology, and is considered one of the best practices in this field on the local and regional level.

    Evidence

    Led the national unification of 42 government services onto a single platform, reducing average processing time by 93% from 6 days to under 4 hours and improving customer satisfaction from 78% to 96%.

    Narrative

    Mentored and trained a team of 18, established a data-driven service-design guild adopted authority-wide, and set the unit's strategic roadmap.

    Narrative

  • 1.4

    Efficiency in dealing with professional challenges

    Excellent76

    Justification

    Evidence maps to the “Excellent” band. The employee demonstrated high efficiency in dealing with large and complex job challenges, and used innovative and flexible solutions that enabled him to turn …

    Official rubric · Excellent

    The employee demonstrated high efficiency in dealing with large and complex job challenges, and used innovative and flexible solutions that enabled him to turn those challenges into achievements that exceeded expectations and supported corporate goals.

    Evidence

    Led the national unification of 42 government services onto a single platform, reducing average processing time by 93% from 6 days to under 4 hours and improving customer satisfaction from 78% to 96%.

    Narrative

    Mentored and trained a team of 18, established a data-driven service-design guild adopted authority-wide, and set the unit's strategic roadmap.

    Narrative

  • 1.5

    Risk and corporate change management

    Good71

    Justification

    Evidence maps to the “Good” band. The employee led comprehensive risk management efforts, including identification, review, and integrated planning, and oversaw multiple change, modernization, a…

    Official rubric · Good

    The employee led comprehensive risk management efforts, including identification, review, and integrated planning, and oversaw multiple change, modernization, and continuous improvement initiatives using modern and advanced methodologies.

    Evidence

    Led the national unification of 42 government services onto a single platform, reducing average processing time by 93% from 6 days to under 4 hours and improving customer satisfaction from 78% to 96%.

    Narrative

    Mentored and trained a team of 18, established a data-driven service-design guild adopted authority-wide, and set the unit's strategic roadmap.

    Narrative

Criterion profile

Score across all applicable criteria.

12346
  • 1Performance & Achievement75
  • 2Continuous Learning73
  • 3Positive & Influential Personality74
  • 4Initiative & Entrepreneurial Awareness74
  • 6Leadership Skills77

Nomination dossier

# Nomination Dossier — Mariam Al Suwaidi

Authority: Ajman Digital Government · Category: Supervisory Employee · Pre-score: 75% (Good)

Summary

Mariam Al Suwaidi, Head of Digital Services at Ajman Digital Government, is nominated in the Supervisory Employee category. Across 5 applicable criteria the nominee reaches an overall pre-score of 75% (Good).

Highlights by criterion

  • Criterion 1 — Performance and Achievement (75%): strongest in 1.2 Contribution to the strategic plan and alignment of achievements with individual and organizational objectives (Excellent).
  • Criterion 2 — Continuous Learning (73%): strongest in 2.2 Efforts to acquire experience and pursue self-development in current and future knowledge and skills, and the extent of their application and impact (Good).
  • Criterion 3 — Positive and Influential Personality (74%): strongest in 3.2 Volunteer work undertaken by the employee, through or outside the authority, supporting social development and serving the community (Excellent).
  • Criterion 4 — Initiative and Entrepreneurial Awareness (74%): strongest in 4.3 Using data and information for analysis, problem-solving, and making informed decisions that support the authority's future vision (Excellent).
  • Criterion 6 — Leadership Skills (77%): strongest in 6.2 Ability to engage in future planning for the organizational unit, anticipating trends and aligning unit and employee objectives while managing change and continuous improvement (Excellent).

Recommendation

Solid candidate — advance for panel review; strengthen evidence on lower-scoring criteria.

_Draft for the jury — decision-support only. The jury makes the final decision._

Jury decision

Record the committee's decision. This is logged to the audit trail.

Prepared on: July 4, 2026