Fatima Al Zaabi
Procurement Specialist
Department of Finance
Overall pre-score
Eligibility screening
Seven hard rules — all must pass.
7 of 7 checks passed
- Meets requirementR1The nominee should hold a full-time employment contract; part-time or temporary contract holders are not eligible.
Holds a full-time contract.
- Meets requirementR2The nominee should not be seconded or assigned at the time of participation, and participation must fall within the scope of the employee's original position, whose duties they actually and continuously perform.
Not seconded or assigned; performs the original position.
- Meets requirementR3The nominee's official job title should correspond to the duties and responsibilities actually performed.
Official job title corresponds to actual duties.
- Meets requirementR4The nominee should have secured a rating of not less than 'very good' in the annual performance evaluation during the last two years of employment.
Last two annual ratings: very good, very good.
- Meets requirementR5The nominee should have completed not less than two years of service with the authority.
7 year(s) of service with the authority.
- Meets requirementR6The nominee's employment file should be free from any disciplinary or penal sanctions during the past two years.
No disciplinary or penal sanctions in the past two years.
- Meets requirementR7The same employee may not be nominated for two consecutive cycles.
Not nominated in the previous cycle.
Category
AI best-fit
Supervisory Employee
Nominated for: Specialized Employee
Rationale
Supervises 2 employees (≥ 2).
Attachments
Savings Analysis.pdf
26,700 characters parsed
Criterion detail
Criteria are weighted equally by default.
5 sub-criteria
- 1.1Limited45
Personal effort and exceptional achievements
Justification
Evidence maps to the “Limited” band. The employee exerted acceptable efforts within the scope of their work and achieved limited or routine accomplishments, with moderate or non-sustainable impact,…
Official rubric · Limited
The employee exerted acceptable efforts within the scope of their work and achieved limited or routine accomplishments, with moderate or non-sustainable impact, without undertaking initiatives beyond routine duties.
Evidence
Negotiated framework agreements that reduced annual spend by AED 12M (18%) and improved supplier performance.
Narrative
Introduced a data-driven supplier-risk scoring method that reduced late deliveries by 38%, trained the procurement team, and led a strategic sourcing review adopted across the department.
Narrative
- 1.2Limited44
Contribution to the strategic plan and alignment of achievements with individual and organizational objectives
Justification
Evidence maps to the “Limited” band. The employee's accomplishments were linked to some individual objectives, but the connection with the organizational or strategic goals was limited or indirect,…
Official rubric · Limited
The employee's accomplishments were linked to some individual objectives, but the connection with the organizational or strategic goals was limited or indirect, resulting in a moderate impact on outcomes.
Evidence
Negotiated framework agreements that reduced annual spend by AED 12M (18%) and improved supplier performance.
Narrative
Introduced a data-driven supplier-risk scoring method that reduced late deliveries by 38%, trained the procurement team, and led a strategic sourcing review adopted across the department.
Narrative
- 1.3Limited35
Speed and accuracy of performance and utilization of time and resources
Justification
Evidence maps to the “Limited” band. Some of the employee's accomplishments demonstrated efficiency, speed, and accuracy in task performance, effectively achieving objectives while making optimal u…
Official rubric · Limited
Some of the employee's accomplishments demonstrated efficiency, speed, and accuracy in task performance, effectively achieving objectives while making optimal use of available time and resources.
Evidence
Negotiated framework agreements that reduced annual spend by AED 12M (18%) and improved supplier performance.
Narrative
Introduced a data-driven supplier-risk scoring method that reduced late deliveries by 38%, trained the procurement team, and led a strategic sourcing review adopted across the department.
Narrative
- 1.4Limited34
Efficiency in dealing with professional challenges
Justification
Evidence maps to the “Limited” band. The employee demonstrated the ability to deal with some job challenges using traditional management strategies, and showed some flexibility in adapting and turn…
Official rubric · Limited
The employee demonstrated the ability to deal with some job challenges using traditional management strategies, and showed some flexibility in adapting and turning obstacles into limited achievements.
Evidence
Negotiated framework agreements that reduced annual spend by AED 12M (18%) and improved supplier performance.
Narrative
Introduced a data-driven supplier-risk scoring method that reduced late deliveries by 38%, trained the procurement team, and led a strategic sourcing review adopted across the department.
Narrative
- 1.5Limited39
Risk and corporate change management
Justification
Evidence maps to the “Limited” band. The employee developed and prepared plans for risk management and certain change, modernization, and continuous improvement initiatives, using basic or conventi…
Official rubric · Limited
The employee developed and prepared plans for risk management and certain change, modernization, and continuous improvement initiatives, using basic or conventional methods.
Evidence
Negotiated framework agreements that reduced annual spend by AED 12M (18%) and improved supplier performance.
Narrative
Introduced a data-driven supplier-risk scoring method that reduced late deliveries by 38%, trained the procurement team, and led a strategic sourcing review adopted across the department.
Narrative
Criterion profile
Score across all applicable criteria.
- 1Performance & Achievement39
- 2Continuous Learning36
- 3Positive & Influential Personality39
- 4Initiative & Entrepreneurial Awareness37
- 6Leadership Skills36
Nomination dossier
# Nomination Dossier — Fatima Al Zaabi
Authority: Department of Finance · Category: Supervisory Employee · Pre-score: 37% (Limited)
Summary
Fatima Al Zaabi, Procurement Specialist at Department of Finance, is nominated in the Supervisory Employee category. Across 5 applicable criteria the nominee reaches an overall pre-score of 37% (Limited).
Highlights by criterion
- Criterion 1 — Performance and Achievement (39%): strongest in 1.1 Personal effort and exceptional achievements (Limited).
- Criterion 2 — Continuous Learning (36%): strongest in 2.3 Transfer of acquired knowledge and skills to others, whether inside or outside the authority (Limited).
- Criterion 3 — Positive and Influential Personality (39%): strongest in 3.4 Effective communication with employees from diverse cultures, embracing diversity, and promoting values of tolerance (Limited).
- Criterion 4 — Initiative and Entrepreneurial Awareness (37%): strongest in 4.3 Using data and information for analysis, problem-solving, and making informed decisions that support the authority's future vision (Limited).
- Criterion 6 — Leadership Skills (36%): strongest in 6.2 Ability to engage in future planning for the organizational unit, anticipating trends and aligning unit and employee objectives while managing change and continuous improvement (Limited).
Recommendation
Below the distinction threshold on current evidence — request additional documentation before the panel.
_Draft for the jury — decision-support only. The jury makes the final decision._
Jury decision
Record the committee's decision. This is logged to the audit trail.
Prepared on: July 4, 2026